There are three doors out of a long-term savings plan, not one. You can keep paying, you can stop paying and leave the money invested, or you can take the surrender value and walk. Which door makes sense turns almost entirely on four numbers, and none of them is the number that upsets people most — the loss they are already sitting on. That money is spent either way. The only question worth answering is what happens to the balance from here.
Most people arrive at this question the same way. A statement lands, or someone finally logs into the portal after two years of not looking, and the surrender value is well below the total of every premium paid in. The reaction is immediate and it is almost always the wrong starting point: how do I get out of this?
That is understandable. It is also the question that leads to the worst decisions, because it treats the past contributions as recoverable. They are not. What you can still influence is the next ten or fifteen years of that money, and that calculation sometimes favours staying put — which surprises people who have already decided the plan was a mistake.
This article sets out how these contracts are built, what changed in UAE regulation in October 2020, and how to work out your own answer from your own policy documents. It does not tell you what to do. Nobody can, without seeing the four numbers below, and those numbers are in your paperwork rather than in any article.
I was introduced to one of these plans through a colleague — not a cold call, a referral, which is how most of them arrive. Fifteen years, structured around my children's future university fees. The pitch leaned entirely on certainty: equity markets fluctuate, education has a fixed date, so you need a fixed return, and this is how you get one. It is a good argument, and for a lot of people it lands. I sat down afterwards and worked out the implied annual return on what was being illustrated. It came out below what a broad index had delivered over comparable stretches, including its bad ones. That was enough for me and I did not take a second meeting.
What I would add, because it matters: I know people holding these plans who are perfectly content. They wanted a predictable number and a structure that forces them to keep paying, and that is exactly what they bought. My conclusion was about my own time horizon and my own tolerance, not about the product being wrong for everyone. If you have a genuine ten to fifteen year runway, you have options that a shorter horizon would not give you — which is a different statement from saying anyone who chose otherwise made a mistake.
What you actually signed
These are insurance contracts, not investment accounts, even though almost all of the money inside them is invested in funds. That distinction drives everything else. An investment account charges you for what you hold. An insurance contract charges you against a schedule agreed at outset, and the schedule was built around a commitment you made to keep paying for a set number of years.
Four features show up in most of them, in one form or another. The names differ between providers and between contract vintages, so treat these as categories to look for rather than terms to search word-for-word.
An initial period. Premiums paid during the opening stretch of the contract — commonly the first eighteen to twenty-four months, though it varies — are treated differently from everything paid afterwards. They buy a separate class of units, often called initial units or capital units, which carry an additional ongoing charge for as long as the policy runs. Premiums after that period buy accumulation units, which do not.
An establishment or structure charge. A percentage taken periodically, usually calculated on those initial units, usually for a fixed number of years.
A policy or administration fee. A flat monthly or quarterly amount. Small in absolute terms, and proportionally large on a smaller policy.
A surrender schedule. The deduction applied if you exit before the end of the agreed term, typically stepping down as the contract matures.
Layer those together and the shape of the thing becomes clear. Costs are loaded towards the front, the term is long, and the surrender value in the early years is designed to sit below the sum of premiums paid. That is not a malfunction. It is the contract working the way it was written, which is precisely why the surrender value is such an unreliable guide to what you ought to do next.
You need three documents: the original policy schedule or illustration you were given at outset, the most recent annual statement, and the provider's current charges schedule for your specific product and vintage. If you cannot find them, the provider will send them — you are the policyholder and you are entitled to them. Every number in the rest of this article comes from those three documents. Working from memory, or from what the adviser said at the time, is how people talk themselves into the wrong door.
The rules changed in October 2020 — and not retrospectively
This is the part most holders of these plans do not know, and it decides which version of the product they are actually in.
In 2019 the UAE's Insurance Authority issued Board of Directors' Decision No. 49, a set of instructions covering life insurance and family takaful. It was originally due to take effect on 16 April 2020, was delayed by six months, and came into force on 16 October 2020. The Insurance Authority's functions have since moved to the Central Bank of the UAE, which maintains the instructions in its rulebook today.
What it did, in the parts that matter to a savings plan holder:
| Article | What it requires |
|---|---|
| Article 3 Commission caps | On the savings element, commission is limited to 4.5% of the annualised premium multiplied by the number of years in the term, with an overall cap of 90% of the annualised premium across the whole term. The protection element is capped separately at 160%. |
| Article 4 Upfront commission | First-year commission on a regular-premium policy is capped at 50% of the annualised premium, or 50% of total commissions payable, whichever is lower. The rest must be paid out in equal instalments over the remaining premium term. First-year commission is subject to clawback for at least the first five years. |
| Article 9 Free-look period | At least 30 calendar days from the earliest of policy issue, cover start, or document signing. |
| Article 10 Illustrations | Protection benefit, cash value, net asset value, maturity benefit and surrender value must each be shown separately and net of all charges, with premiums shown gross. At least two scenarios on clearly stated assumptions. Annual statements required. |
| Article 12 Fund disclosure | Performance of at least the top five funds, with five or more years of history. |
| Article 14 Surrender value | The surrender value must be set so that the insurer's profit is not greater than it would have been had the policyholder not surrendered. |
Read Article 4 again, because it is the one that reshaped the market. Before it, the adviser's commission on a long-term plan could be paid substantially upfront — an arrangement usually described as indemnity commission. The adviser was paid at outset for a commitment the client had not yet made good on, and the charging structure inside the policy existed to recover that money over the following years. Capping the first year at half and forcing the rest to be spread changes the economics of selling these plans entirely.
These provisions applied going forward. They were not applied retrospectively to policies already in force. If you signed before 16 October 2020, your contract was written under the previous regime and the caps above never applied to it. If you signed after, they did. Two people describing what sounds like the same product can therefore be in materially different contracts, and this is the first thing to establish before comparing notes with anyone.
Three doors, not one
Almost every conversation about these plans collapses into a binary — stay in or get out. There is a third option that sits between them, and it is the one people most often overlook.
| Option | What happens | Tends to suit | The catch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keep paying | Contract runs to term. Front-loaded charges are already largely behind you; later premiums are charged more lightly. | Policies well past the initial period, particularly where a loyalty or maturity bonus is written into the contract. | You are committed to years of further premiums, and the fund menu stays whatever the provider offers. |
| Make it paid-up | You stop paying. The policy stays in force and the existing balance stays invested, with charges continuing against it. | Holders who want to stop adding to the contract without triggering a surrender deduction. | Charges keep running against a fund no longer being topped up. Some contracts impose a minimum, reduce benefits, or restrict the option outright. |
| Surrender | The contract ends. You receive the surrender value and reinvest it wherever you choose. | Early-stage policies with a long remaining term and a large gap between the plan's cost and the alternative. | The deduction is taken immediately, and any life cover attached to the policy ends with it. |
Keeping it going
The case for staying is stronger than most people expect, and it rests on a single point: if the heavy charges were front-loaded, you have already paid them. A policy eight years into a fifteen-year term is not the same proposition as the one that was sold to you in year one. The expensive part is behind you and the remaining premiums are working under a lighter load.
Check specifically whether your contract carries a loyalty bonus, maturity bonus or premium holiday allowance. Some do, some do not, and they are frequently forgotten because they sit years away from the date of sale. If one exists and it is conditional on maintaining premiums to term, surrendering forfeits it, and that has to sit on the ledger alongside everything else.
Making it paid-up
Paid-up status stops the premiums without ending the contract. The money already inside stays invested and the policy continues.
The obvious appeal is that you avoid the surrender deduction. The less obvious problem is that the charges do not stop. A fund that is no longer receiving contributions is now absorbing the establishment charge, the policy fee and the ongoing initial-unit charge out of a static balance. On a small policy with a flat monthly fee, that erosion can be significant in proportional terms.
Terms vary considerably here. Some contracts require a minimum fund value before paid-up status is available. Some reduce or remove attached benefits. Some do not permit it at all. This is a provider-and-vintage question, and the only reliable source is your own policy conditions.
Surrendering
Surrender is the cleanest option and the one that feels worst, because it converts a paper loss into a realised one. The emotional weight of that moment is real, and it causes people to stay in contracts purely to avoid confronting it.
The financial question is narrower than the emotional one. It is not how much have I lost. It is: taking the surrender value as today's starting capital, does that sum, invested elsewhere at a realistic cost, beat what the policy is projected to deliver over the same remaining years? Sometimes it does, comfortably. Sometimes it does not, particularly on a policy well into its term. The gap between those two outcomes is not a matter of opinion — it is arithmetic, and you can do it.
One thing that is often missed: if the policy carries life cover you actually need, ending it ends the cover too, and replacing it at your current age and health may cost more than it did when the policy was written. Price the replacement before you cancel, not after.
The four numbers that decide it
Pull these from your documents. Once you have all four, the decision usually makes itself, and it takes about twenty minutes.
| # | Number | Where to find it and why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Current surrender value | Latest statement, or request a current figure from the provider. This is your actual starting capital under the surrender option — not the fund value, which is shown before the deduction. |
| 2 | Total ongoing charge, as a percentage of fund value per year | The charges schedule. Add the establishment charge, the policy fee, the ongoing initial-unit charge and the underlying fund charges, then express the total against your current fund value. This is the single most useful figure in the whole exercise and almost nobody has it to hand. |
| 3 | Years remaining, and premiums still due | Policy schedule. Determines how much of the front-loaded cost is already sunk and how much commitment remains. |
| 4 | Any bonus or benefit conditional on reaching term | Policy conditions. Loyalty bonus, maturity bonus, attached life cover. Everything forfeited by exiting early belongs in the comparison. |
Then run one comparison. Take number 1 as your opening capital and project it forward over the years in number 3 at a return assumption you would be comfortable defending — net of the cost of whatever you would move to. Separately, project the policy forward using its own illustration, net of number 2, and add number 4. Compare the two figures.
Use the same return assumption on both sides. The most common error people make here is running the policy on the provider's illustrated growth rate and the alternative on something more optimistic, which guarantees the answer they were already leaning towards. If you want to sanity-check the compounding, our SIP calculator handles the arithmetic on the reinvestment side.
Advisers on both sides of this question have an interest in the answer. The person who sold the plan may be paid trail commission while it stays in force. An adviser offering to move you may be paid on what they move you into. Neither fact makes their analysis wrong, but it does mean the same set of numbers can be presented to support either conclusion. Ask anyone who runs the comparison for you how they are paid, and ask to see both projections built on the same growth assumption.
Where the money goes instead
If surrender or paid-up status is where you land, the follow-on question is what the balance does next — and it deserves more thought than it usually gets. Money released from a long-term plan tends to sit in a current account for months while its owner recovers from the decision.
For a genuine long horizon, the low-cost route from the UAE is a broad ETF portfolio held through a regulated broker, with Ireland-domiciled funds rather than US-listed ones for reasons set out in our ETF investing guide for UAE expats. If the plan was originally sold to fund school or university fees, our guide to investing for children's education in the UAE covers how that goal is usually structured outside an insurance wrapper. And if the released capital is doing double duty as a safety net, the sizing logic in our UAE expat emergency fund guide is the place to start — cash that may be needed within two or three years does not belong in a growth portfolio at all.
On the platform side, Sarwa and Interactive Brokers sit at different ends of the same spectrum: a managed portfolio with a simple interface, or a self-directed account with a lower running cost and a steeper first week. The beginner's guide to investing in the UAE covers the ground between them.
The Broker Match Quiz takes two minutes and narrows the field by regulation, cost and how hands-on you want to be.
EW+ View
Three observations from working through this with a lot of people.
The first is that the sunk cost is doing most of the damage. The gap between premiums paid and surrender value is the number everyone stares at, and it is the one number that has no bearing on the decision. It is gone under all three options. Once people genuinely accept that, the choice gets much easier and much less emotional.
The second is that the answer correlates strongly with where you are in the term. Early in the contract, with most of the commitment still ahead, the comparison often favours getting the capital into something cheaper. Late in the contract, with the front-loaded costs already absorbed and a conditional bonus in sight, it often does not. There is no single verdict that covers both, and any article — or adviser — offering one is not looking at your schedule.
The third is about the product rather than the decision. These plans are sold on certainty, and certainty is a real preference, not a failure of understanding. Someone who wanted a predictable figure and a structure that made them keep paying got what they bought. The question worth asking is narrower than whether the product is any good: given the horizon you actually have, and what it costs you each year to stay, does that certainty still earn its price? For a lot of people with fifteen years in front of them the answer is no. For someone three years from a fixed obligation, it may well be yes.
Common questions
Usually, through paid-up status or a premium holiday, but the terms differ by provider and by contract vintage. Some require a minimum fund value, some reduce attached benefits, and some do not offer it. Your policy conditions are the only reliable source.
Because the charges on these contracts are weighted towards the opening years and an early-exit deduction applies on top. The structure was designed around you completing the full term. It is the contract operating as written rather than an error, though it is rarely as clearly explained at the point of sale as it is in the paperwork.
Only if it was issued on or after 16 October 2020. Board of Directors' Decision No. 49 of 2019 was not applied retrospectively, so contracts written before that date operate under the earlier regime.
Servicing rights on many of these contracts can be reassigned, which changes who receives any ongoing commission without altering the policy's charges. It solves a service problem, not a cost problem — the underlying structure stays exactly as it was.
Most of these contracts are issued from offshore jurisdictions and are not tied to UAE residence, so they generally continue. What can change materially is the tax treatment in your next country of residence, and for some destinations that is a significant factor. Establish the position before you move rather than after — our guide to what happens to your investments when leaving the UAE covers the wider exit picture.
Next steps
- Request your current surrender value, the full charges schedule for your product and vintage, and your original illustration from the provider directly.
- Establish whether the policy was issued before or after 16 October 2020.
- Work out the four numbers above, particularly the total annual charge as a percentage of fund value.
- Run both projections on the same growth assumption, over the same remaining years.
- If life cover is attached and you need it, price a standalone replacement before making any decision that ends it.
Official sources
Every figure in this article is checked against the primary source. These are the places to verify the current position for yourself, since rates, rules and product terms change.
- CBUAE Rulebook — Decision No. 49 of 2019 →The life insurance instructions quoted throughout this article